hi! i have a question regarding RFC 2741 "7.2.3.2. Subagent Processing of the agentx-GetNext-PDU"
i use snmpwalk to walk over my mib, snmp dump: ( name is netsnmp_variable_list->name value, and range is netsnmp_request_info->range_end ) mode: 160 inclusive: 1 range: xxx.1.2.1.15527. name: xxx.1.2.1.15526. -> reply with value xxx.1.2.1.15526 mode: 161 inclusive: 0 range: xxx.1.2.1.15527. name: xxx.1.2.1.15526. -> reply with end-of-mib mode: 161 inclusive: 1 range: xxx.1.2.2.15527. name: xxx.1.2.1.15526. and... i have 2 variables: xxx.1.2.1.15526 and xxx.1.2.2.15526 according to RFC i must return xxx.1.2.1.15526 ( since inclusive flag is set) but if a make this - then snmpwalk reports that "Error: OID not increasing" if i ignoring RFC and return xxx.1.2.2.15526 - all is ok. is net-snmp really not rfc-compliant in this part or i miss something? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
