Hi Dave,
                Thanks for the response. I have been experimenting with the 
monitor function (specifying an event) and I have found some behavior which I 
can not explain. When I use the following line in the snmpd.conf file:

notificationEvent SupplyVoltage 1.3.6.1.4.1.33302.10.6.1 -n

I get the following error in the in the snmpd.log file when snmpd is started:

/usr/local/share/snmp/snmpd.conf: line 69: Error: unrecognised option

If I remove the '-n', the error goes away, but the documentation in the web 
site below states that the -n is required?

http://www.net-snmp.org/docs/man/snmpd.conf.html


Regards,
Richard


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Dave Shield
Sent: Friday, 8 May 2009 8:47 PM
To: Richard Gipps
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: SNMP V1 traps

2009/5/8 Richard Gipps <[email protected]>:
>        The neat
> monitor facility in snmpd works great for V2c but does not seem appropriate
> for V1 as it relies on types (macros) defined in SMI-V2 such as
> NOTIFICATION-TYPE to generate the correct information for the trap.

Please read the FAQ entry
    Can I use SNMPv1 requests with an SNMPv2 MIB (or vice versa)?
         (http://net-snmp.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/FAQ:General_15)

> Is there
> another mechanism for timing the generating V1 traps

No - just use "monitor" as before.

Dave

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image 
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to