2009/7/15 Mike Jones <[email protected]>:
> The material that I've read about augmented tables indicate that if a
> row is created in ifTable, the corresponding row in ifXTable should be
> created as well.
>
> Does that indicate that in order to retrieve information specified in
> ifXTable, I need to get ifTable.*rownumber*.23 to retrieve ifName?
No.
First of all, you've got the index and column subidentifiers the wrong
way round (and you've omitted the ifEntry subidentifier).
The OID of an instance of 'ifSpecific' would actually be something
like:
ifTable.ifEntry.ifSpecific.{rownumber}
But the OID of an instance of 'ifName' is *not*:
ifTable.ifEntry.ifName.{rownumber}
It is actually
ifXTable.ifXEntry.ifName.{rownumber}
> Or is it the case that once the row in ifXTable is created via creating
> a row in ifTable, the rows of ifXTable are accessible like any other row?
Yes.
> Aside from the shared index, what other association do the tables have?
As far as the SNMP protocol is concerned, these two tables are
completely independent. The linkage between the two is a matter of
semantics, not syntax. It's up to the agent and management application
to pull these two halves together - the low-level protocol operations
don't care.
Dave
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
