Hello Wes Hardaker,
Thanks very much for your inputs.
Sorry that i am getting back to you on this topic bit late.
I'm trying to create more than 3000 VLAN's here.
OK the version i am using is 5.3.1 and trace leads us to following back
trace contents as below:
*(gdb) bt
#0 0xb7d4de08 in snmp_oid_compare (in_name1=0x0, len1=135835360,
in_name2=0x8187b00, len2=1) at snmp_api.c:6321
#1 0xb7d9ed47 in netsnmp_compare_netsnmp_index (lhs=0x8188040,
rhs=0x8187af8) at container.c:436
#2 0xb7d9f9dd in binary_search (val=0x8187af8, c=0x82cb770, exact=1) at
container_binary_array.c:139
#3 0xb7da02ac in netsnmp_binary_array_remove (c=0x82cb770, key=0x8187af8,
save=0x0) at container_binary_array.c:307
#4 0xb7da0347 in _ba_remove (container=0x82cb770, data=0x8187af8) at
container_binary_array.c:531
#5 0xb7ed4dcd in CONTAINER_REMOVE (k=<value optimized out>, x=<value
optimized out>) at ../../include/net-snmp/library/container.h:393
#6 _check_entry_for_updates (rowreq_ctx=0x80bc890, magic=0xbf91d260) at
ip-mib/ipAddressTable/ipAddressTable_data_access.c:235
#7 0xb7d9f91b in netsnmp_binary_array_for_each (sort=<value optimized out>,
context=<value optimized out>, fe=<value optimized out>, c=<value optimized
out>)
at container_binary_array.c:342
#8 _ba_for_each (container=0x80ba950, f=0xb7ed4d20
<_check_entry_for_updates>, context=0xbf91d260) at
container_binary_array.c:551
#9 0xb7ed5040 in ipAddressTable_container_load (container=0x80ba950) at
ip-mib/ipAddressTable/ipAddressTable_data_access.c:349
#10 0xb7ed0b0a in _cache_load (cache=0x80ba110, vmagic=0x80ba950) at
ip-mib/ipAddressTable/ipAddressTable_interface.c:1912
#11 0xb7dda955 in _cache_load (cache=0x80ba110) at cache_handler.c:537
#12 0xb7d84893 in run_alarms () at snmp_alarm.c:252
#13 0x0804aa3d in receive () at snmpd.c:1233
#14 main (argc=7, argv=0xbf91d694) at snmpd.c:1036
#15 0xb7a8ae0c in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
#16 0x08049cf1 in _start ()
(gdb) Connection to 10.20.104.142 closed by remote host.*
Basically container remove fails whenever the ipAddressTable needs to be
cleaned up.
Do you suggest some better options here?
Thanks once again.
Best regards,
Bheemesh
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Wes Hardaker <
harda...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:12:41 +0530, bheemesh v <bheem...@gmail.com>
> said:
>
> bv> Is there any limitations for the number of IP Table entries with
> IP-MIB.
>
> No, in theory. You'd be limited by memory and/or processing power.
>
> bv> When ever we try to configure large number of VLAN's or VRF's, the
> bv> netsnmp (snmpd) seems to crash in failure of coantainer
> bv> insert/remove cases.
>
> That, however, would be a bug. That shouldn't be happening and getting
> a stack trace of the problem (and reporting the Net-SNMP version number)
> would help there.
> --
> Wes Hardaker
> Cobham Analytic Solutions
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
