Mike Ayers wrote:
>> From: Dave Shield [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 12:35 AM
>
>> 2009/12/3 Les Mikesell <[email protected]>:
>>> And is there some particular reason you'd want to do this [SNMP-over-
>> TCP]?
>>> Seems like a bad idea if your network is unreliable and not needed
>> if it is.
>>
>> At the risk of aggravating Mike's blood pressure (and/or olfactory
>> receptors),
>> you might like to have a quick look at one of the presentations from
>> the
>> Dublin IETF meeting last summer.
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/72/slides/opsarea-2.pdf
>
> Thanks for the consideration, but good meaty stuff like this will never
> upset me. Wish this kind of thinking had been applied ten years ago. Nice
> work, Wes!
>
> If I could ever find some spare time I'd love to do some follow-up
> research.
I'm too lazy to do the math, but those graphs look fairly predictable
just from the number of packets and retry times involved - at least
considering the syn retransmit timing spec and tcp retry backoff.
--
Les Mikesell
[email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience,
a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing.
Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
