Hi all, Sorry for this question, I've tried to find some info but failed and I have minimal exposure to SNMP. It's not directly related to netsnmp, but is related to SNMPv1.
I have an MIB with a table of alarms (which has dynamic length/rows); each entry in the table is a sequence of ten different fields. I need to notify some other (remote) node (that will eventually poll the table in full - but not regularly) via a trap that one of the table entries has changed. Is there a normal way to do this? Is it normal to send a trap having bound variables to each of the fields in the sequence (with the suffixed table-entry-index on the OIDs)? My (very limited) understanding is that sending a trap with bound variables will update the other end's copy of the variables so that it's ok to send a trap in the interim before the remote node does a get/getnext... to update the whole table. Am I barking up the right tree? Thanks for any insight, Doug. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
