Hi - In your reply to note in title, you said:
There is a flag that can improve performance if the internal indexing matches the SNMP ordering, but it's still probably not the most efficient of the helpers. Where is the flag and when do I set it? I have the iterate_access code working now so I may stick with this for small tables. You also said: My best advice is to use a different helper! For a (larger) table of data that is in the kernel or a database or somewhere else external, which helper do you recommend? My guess is the mfd using the cache-handler but not entirely sure. Thanks. Kathy McLeod Dept S82 CCB - SNMP IBM Rochester, MN (507) 253-4803 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
