hi there I am trying to write a very simple code single mib , single
field (see below) , the purpose is to perform an snmpset from bash to
this single field via script and then a simple snmpget from manager
station , I am using mib2c with this template mib2c.int_watch.conf ,
themn I am using gcc to compile to a filename.so.

my snmpd.conf contains :  dlmod ApocValue /usr/lib/filename.so

It seems i can snmpget and see the default value but when I try to
snmpset I get the follwoing error:


[r...@kanaboodi mibs]# snmpset -v 2c -c boodi-set localhost ApocValue i
50
Error in packet.
Reason: notWritable (That object does not support modification)
Failed object: MY-COMPANY3-MIB::ApocValue

What am I doing wrong here?

BTW - Using Centos 5.5 x86 , net-snmp version 5.3.2


MIB FILE
-------------------

MY-COMPANY3-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN

IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, enterprises, Integer32 FROM SNMPv2-SMI;

-- root of our MIB will point to enterprises

myCompany3MIB MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED
"201011210000Z"
ORGANIZATION
"my org"
CONTACT-INFO
"email: r...@localhost"
DESCRIPTION
"Example MIB"
REVISION
"201011210001Z"
DESCRIPTION
"snmp SET test mib"
::= { enterprises 36506 }

ApocValue OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { myCompany3MIB 1 }

-- time to define apoc values

apoc OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-write
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Apoc Set from script"
::= { ApocValue 1 }

END






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to