Hi Norman,

Please don't put a table within a table. I'm pretty sure it's not a
legal MIB construct, and it would certainly break a lot of things.

Consider whether you can accomplish the same data association by using
two separate tables, one having one index:

moduleTable
  -moduleTableEntry
      -moduleTableID (index INTEGER)
      -info (DisplayString)
      -subModuleCount (COUNTER)
      -etc...

... and the other table having two indices, whereof the first is an
external index, the same as in the first table, and the second is some
sub-module index:

subModuleTable
  -subModuleEntry
     -moduleTableID (external index)
     -subModulID (index INTEGER)
     -sub module information vars...

Also consider using the Counter or Counter64 types for your counter values.

Best regards,
Joel Hansell

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 4:27 PM,  <normanrae...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> i try to build my first complex mib structure with net-snmp. The mib 
> structure contains more then one dynamic tables. I use a table
> like the bottom table.
>
> static oid moduleTable_oid[] = {1,3,6,1,4,1,26000,25,3,3};
>
> 26000.25.3.3                           moduleTable (table)
> 26000.25.3.3.modID                     modulEntryID (keyIndex INTEGER)
> 26000.25.3.3.modID.1.0                 info (DisplayString)
> 26000.25.3.3.modID.2.1.0               modIndex (INTEGER)
> 26000.25.3.3.modID.2.2.0               ....
> 26000.25.3.3.modID.2.3.0               ....
> 26000.25.3.3.modID.2.7.1.0             subModulCount (INTEGER)
> 26000.25.3.3.modID.2.7.2.subModID      ....
> 26000.25.3.3.modID.2.7.3               subModulTable (table)
> 26000.25.3.3.modID.2.7.3.subModID.1.0  subModulID (index INTEGER)
> 26000.25.3.3.modID.2.7.3.subModID.2.0
> 26000.25.3.3.modID.2.7.3.subModID.3.0Raedke
>
> 26000.25.3.3.modID.2.7.3.subModID.4.0
> 26000.25.3.3.modID.2.7.3.subModID.5.0
> 26000.25.3.3.modID.2.7.3.subModID.6.1.0
>
> Foer example, if i have to devices with four channels i have to create two 
> tables with four sub tables for each device. I'm not shure if it possible tor 
> realize the obove structure.
>
> How can i deal with this the e.g '26000.25.3.3.modID.2.1.0'.
> It is possible to handle sub object id's within a table like the number 2.
>
> I hobe somebody can help me.
>
> Norman Raedke
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> GRATIS! Movie-FLAT mit über 300 Videos.
> Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Lotusphere 2011
> Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how
> to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment
> to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d
> _______________________________________________
> Net-snmp-users mailing list
> Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lotusphere 2011
Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how
to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment
to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to