*
*
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Dave Shield <d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk>wrote:
> On 7 March 2011 21:12, Zongjun <qizong...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have tried to use different ports other than 6161 (7161,9161,3456), and
> > still got the "bind failed" error below.
>
> You can ignore that error.
>
> > I was running at root. So
> > permission is not a problem. And I was using a port that was not used at
> > all. Not sure why the [init_smux] gave the error.
>
> The error is coming from the SMUX module, which is trying to open
> the standard SMUX port (199). If the standard agent is still running,
> then this will already be using the SMUX port, so your second agent
> cannot open it. Hence the error message that you are seeing.
>
> But that's not important here. You can ignore this message.
>
>
> > But it did reports a request was received.
> > /usr/sbin/snmpd -f -Le -C -c /tmp/snmpd.conf 6161
> > [init_smux] bind failed: Permission denied
> > NET-SNMP version 5.3.2.2
> > Connection from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:52007
> >
> > [] snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost:6161 snmpEngine.0
> > SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB::snmpEngine.0 = No Such Object
>
> Hmmm....
> I'm running out of ideas here.
>
> What does walking the sysORTable show?
>
Dave, it shows:
snmpwalk localhost sysORTable
SNMPv2-MIB::sysORTable = No Such Object available on this agent at this OID
>
> Dave
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You
This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details
its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative
solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
