Hi,
In my snmpd.conf i have the following entry:
trap2sink 10.10.10.112:162 public
trap2sink nsn.nms.com:162 public
Is this the correct syntax. I read the following in snmpd.conf man page ..
"This mechanism is being deprecated, and the listening port should be
specified via the transport specification HOST instead."
So does my above entry in snmpd.conf holds good ? If not what needs to be
changed. A example will bevery helpful.
If the above syntax holds good then i am good to start my tests on
notifications.
Regards
-anand
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Dave Shield <d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk>wrote:
> On 20 July 2011 14:20, anand anand <hianandh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Please let me know if my understanding is correct :
> >
> > Application sends the trap to snmpd on the
> > NETSNMP_AGENTX_SOCKET which is /var/agentx/master.
> >
> > We configure trap2sink or trapsess in snmpd.conf so that
> > snmpd forwards this trap/inform to a receiver, which can be
> > snmptrapd or any other receiver.
> >
> > Is my above understanding correct ?
>
> Yes
>
>
> > Do we also need to build the Trap MIB into net-snmp ?
>
> No
>
> Dave
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 Tips for Better Web Security
Learn 10 ways to better secure your business today. Topics covered include:
Web security, SSL, hacker attacks & Denial of Service (DoS), private keys,
security Microsoft Exchange, secure Instant Messaging, and much more.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426210/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
