On 1 February 2012 17:41, Francois Bouchard <[email protected]> wrote:
>>What is the actual, concrete, exact MIB definition of the specific MIB
>> object mpbcRMHAlarmIndex?
>
> Here is the MIB OID definition that that the code in my last post comes
> from.
[snip]
Thanks.
That confirms my suspicion - the MIB definitions of the two index
objects are not quite correct:
> mpbcRMHNotifiedNMSipAddressEntry OBJECT-TYPE
:
> INDEX {
> mpbcRMHNotifiedNMSipAddress-IP,
> mpbcRMHNotifiedNMSipAddress-Description
> }
These two are the index objects for the table...
> mpbcRMHNotifiedNMSipAddress-IP OBJECT-TYPE
> MAX-ACCESS read-write
> mpbcRMHNotifiedNMSipAddress-Description OBJECT-TYPE
> MAX-ACCESS read-write
so ought to be defined as "not-accessible"
> mpbcRMHNotifiedNMSipAddress-Enabled OBJECT-TYPE
> MAX-ACCESS read-write
This is the only column object that needs to be implemented.
If you make the two index object "not-accessible", and re-run
mib2c, you should find that the data structure looks closer
to what you were expecting.
Dave
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
