On 2 February 2012 22:03, Francois Bouchard <[email protected]> wrote: >> That makes sense - you can't have a row without an index. >> Otherwise how are you going to refer to that row in the future? > > So this row index - or called the row's instance - is not like the INDEX > statement in one MIB. It does'nt have any link?
Sorry - I don't understand what you are asking here. The INDEX statement is part of the definition of a MIB table. It defines the style of indexing for that table - how many index values each row will have, and what types of value they take. For example your mpbcRMHNotifiedNMSipAddressTable has two index values - one an IP address, and the other a string (Though I don't really understand why you are using the description object as part of the indexing of the table!) The indexes within a row data structure specify the actual index values for that particular row - e.g. 10.10.10.10 and "internal example" or 127.0.0.1 and "loopback" The number and type (and semantics) of these values must match the definitions of the MIB objects listed in the INDEX clause. If that doesn't answer what you are asking, then you'll need to be a bit more specific Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
