Hello list
It seems that forcing a cache xxx_table_load() from the handler with a
Global table_data variable is not a good idea. When the handler is called,
does it hold a copy of the table?
Note: cache machanism is disabled. But xxx_Table_load() routine is kept.
should I use
netsnmp_cache_reqinfo_extract<http://www.net-snmp.org/dev/agent/group__cache__handler.html#ga58ecdafd59f4b72f1d41aa25bf088ddf>()
in the handler instead of a global netsnmp_tdata pointer?
Francois
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
