Oh sorry. I made a ^C + ^V mistake.
The correct item I should have pasted is:
-- 1.3.6.1.4.1.3979.7.4.3.2.2.1.1.1
awOduChannelIndex OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER (1..12)
MAX-ACCESS accessible-for-notify
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Indice da lista de canais (1..12)."
::= { awOduChannelEntry 1 }
And of course I don't plan to query it, but just be able to snmpwalk or
snmptable over `awOduChannelTable`.
The whole MIB is almost 2000 lines. Should I post it here anyway?
Thanks!
Em 3 de abril de 2012 12:04, Dave Shield <d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk>escreveu:
> On 3 April 2012 15:44, Jaques Arantes <jaques.aran...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have a MIB where 3 tables contain as first element items marked as
> > "not-accessible", like:
> >
> >
> > -- 1.3.6.1.4.1.3979.7.4.3.2.2.1
> > awOduChannelTable OBJECT-TYPE
> > SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF AwOduChannelEntry
> > MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
>
> That's correct - this is an "internal" MIB definition for the table as a
> whole.
> It's not a leaf object, so can't be queried directly.
>
>
> > awOduChannelEntry OBJECT-TYPE
> > SYNTAX AwOduChannelEntry
> > MAX-ACCESS accessible-for-notify
>
> This is wrong.
> The 'Entry' object is *also* an internal MIB definition, which cannot
> be queried directly. This should also be defined as "not-accessible".
>
>
> Please post the whole of your MIB file, so that we can see what
> it looks like.
>
> Dave
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
