>> My immediate suspicion is that you may be querying a vendor-supplied
>> (full) agent rather than your newly-compiled mini agent
>> How are you starting the agent?
Let me double check with a clean setup. I built mini agent and scped the
snmpd binary to the machine I am monitoring. I had similar doubt and double
checked md5sum and also tried copying snmpd to a different location on the
machine. I am starting it as follows: "/tmp/snmpd -f -c
/etc/snmp/snmpd.conf -M /share/snmp/mibs/". Could it be that the other snmp
(old) libs sitting on the machine are causing this? Perhaps, I should try
with a fresh setup.
Thanks,
Sudhanshu
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Dave Shield <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 31 July 2012 18:18, Sudhanshu Rajvaidya <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Yes, I get similar summary at the end of configure. In particular,
> default
> > modules are exactly same. However, when I run this mini agent my snmpwalk
> > returns pretty much similar response as I would get from full agent. In
> > particular, I am was hoping not to see host, tcp etc. subtrees under
> mibII.
> > Please let me know if it is expected to see these subtrees in snmpwalk
> > response from mini agent.
>
>
> No - if your agent has been compiled with the configuration shown,
> it should *not* be returning information from the host or tcp subtrees.
>
> .
>
>
> Dave
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
