Could someone be more precise on this ?
I don't get it.

D.


2013/5/14 Shing-Kun Kuo (shkuo) <sh...@cisco.com>

>  Hi David,****
>
> ** **
>
> Same topic in the web. It states that ****
>
> ”If the policy extensions in the CA certificate indicate that it must be
> verified by CRL or OSCP - then you may have a legitimate hang in your
> application when it can't find the root CA to verify parts of this process.”
> ****
>
> ** **
>
>
> http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/17391/can-an-intermediate-ca-be-trusted-like-a-self-signed-root-ca
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,
>
> Shing****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* David W [mailto:david....@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 14, 2013 1:53 AM
> *To:* net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Subject:* Re: snmp3 & intermediate CA certs****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi all,****
>
> A little up on this. If someone have some more informations for me.****
>
> Thank you.****
>
> ** **
>
> 2013/4/25 David W <david....@gmail.com>****
>
> Hi everybody,****
>
> I'm currently trying to get net-snmp 5.7.2 communicating through tsm
> authPriv snmpv3 using intermediate CA signed certificates, but I cannot
> achieve this, while it works when certs are signed by a Root CA.****
>
> My question is: does net-snmp handles intermediate CA signed certificates
> ? And if yes, how do I have to configure both sides(agent+client) to
> communicate ?****
>
> Thanks.****
>
> ** **
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform delivers complete
security visibility with the essential security capabilities. Easily and
efficiently configure, manage, and operate all of your security controls
from a single console and one unified framework. Download a free trial.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/alienvault_d2d
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to