On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Pushpa Thimmaiah <
pushpa.thimma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you Fulko Hew , Alan.
>
> My doubt was
> 1. Does AgentX feature only to handle request from querying application
> i.e snmpwalk
> <pushpa> I gone through wikipidea, It says that it can be used to send
> trap using 'agentxtrap' </pushpa>
>
> I need net-snmp only to send traps,
> 1. Is it better to use agentxtrap to send trap
> 2. Does 'agentxtrap' has any advantages over 'snmptrap'
>
If you are making a fully-managed application with its own sub-agent, then
using agentx
to send your traps is the 'more better' way to go. With this approach, the
target trap
receivers are configured into the master, and would not need to also/again
be configured
into each sender. That simplifies the system configuration, and eliminated
duplicate config info.
If all you need to do is send a simple trap (one without query-able
variables, and you don't
mind the duplicate config issue, then you can use snmptrap to send your
traps. Keep in mind
that your application will need to fork/shell snmptrap in order to use it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
