Hello Ulrich,
Thanks a lot for your message. Such a pity. Is any way to harden existing
solutions?
>Вторник, 19 января 2016, 9:44 +01:00 от "Ulrich Windl"
><ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de>:
>
>>>> Igor Sobinov < sl...@mail.ru > schrieb am 19.01.2016 um 08:40 in Nachricht
>< 1453189226.363034...@f324.i.mail.ru >:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I found that net-snmp v3 supports sha or md5 as authentication algorithm. I
>> know that sha-1 is cracked. What version of sha is used in net-snmp? Also,
>
>Hi!
>
>What makes you think "SHA-1 is cracked"? I guess 99.9999% of all secrets are
>easier to "crack" than SHA-1 or MD5, meaning: SHA-256 doesn't make a poor
>secret any better.
>
>> md5 is not reliable to attacks, is any ways to use stronger methods for
>> authentication?
>
>AFAIK, the RFC only knows about MD5 and SHA-1. So anything else is pretty much
>non-standard anyway, I'm afarid.
>
>Regards,
>Ulrich
>
>>
>> Bye, Igor
>
>
>
>
Bye, Igor
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
