Hello NET-SNMP Fellows.

I’m developing a agentx subagent specifically to my Company MIB.
Everything is OK, except when I send v2 notifications.
One simple notification sent from my agent thru send_v2trap( var_list ) 
function,
results in sometimes 128 notifications received in the  trap receiver of my 
network
management station, no matter what trap receiver I use. (PRTG MONITOR SNMP
from Paessler, AdventNet MIB Browser, etc.).
All received notifications are the same.

Facts occurring:
- I noted that depending of the routine where the notification are sending 
inside my
code the number of duplicates received in the management station varies.
- Using localhost snmptrapd I noted that only one trap was registered in the 
syslog.
- The problem also occur when I send traps using sendtrap outside my code 
(directly
from the console).
I did not tracked network packages using wireshark to see how this duplicates 
are
been generate.

Environment:
Linux 16.04.1-Ubuntu 32bits in a VM machine.
net-snmp 5.7.3
gcc version 5.4.0
Netbeans c/c++ 8.2

What well I’m doing wrong or perhaps what parameter I need to adjust in my
subagent or in the master agent (NETSNMP_DS_LIBRARY_ID, 
NETSNMP_DS_APPLICATION_ID,
etc) ???

I read some posts about possible timemout (???)  but very confusing since
I’m sending those notifications under UDP that did not requires any 
verification like informs …
But due the fact that the number of duplicates received vary as I said before, 
perhaps
something in this context can really be wrong.

Any help will be very very appreciated!
Thank you!

Merry Christmas for all!

  



 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to