Janne,
Please provide more detail, or perhaps an example of your proposed traps.
I read your question differently from Bill.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 1:17 PM Bill Fenner <fen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 7:44 AM Janne Paalijarvi <jpaal...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Is it considered ok to put sequence OID elements to trap contents?
>>
>
> If I understand the question right, you're asking about including objects
> belonging to a table? Many trap definitions do this; when constructing the
> trap, you have to be careful to include the full OID of the instance you're
> replying with (e.g., ifIndex.42, not just ifIndex, even though the OBJECTS
> in the linkUp NOTIFICATION-TYPE just says "ifindex"). Meaning, given
>
> linkUp NOTIFICATION-TYPE
>
> OBJECTS { ifIndex, ifAdminStatus, ifOperStatus }
>
> you should construct the trap with, e.g.,
>
> ifIndex.42 = 42 ifAdminStatus.42 = up ifOperStatus.42 = down
>
> (using those arguments to the "snmptrap" command should create a
> well-formed varbind list for a linkUp trap.)
>
> Bill
>
> _______________________________________________
> Net-snmp-users mailing list
> Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
>
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
