Hi Charles, The next time you see it in this state, can you run "sudo ss -pane" and share the output? I wonder if there are multiple listeners on port 53 and that is confusing the data collection.
Bill On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 8:50 PM Charles Polisher <c...@chasmo.org> wrote: > > net-snmp ver 5.9.1 > > > > $ snmpwalk -v2c <etc> localhost .1 > > > > <elided> > > TCP-MIB::tcpInErrs.0 = Counter32: 0 > > TCP-MIB::tcpOutRsts.0 = Counter32: 0 > > > TCP-MIB::tcpConnectionState.ipv4."192.168.122.102".52680.ipv4."192.168.1.200".514 > > > = INTEGER: established(5) > > > TCP-MIB::tcpConnectionProcess.ipv4."192.168.122.102".52680.ipv4."192.168.1.200".514 > > > = Gauge32: 1321 > > TCP-MIB::tcpListenerProcess.ipv4."0.0.0.0".22 = Gauge32: 970 > > TCP-MIB::tcpListenerProcess.ipv4."0.0.0.0".25 = Gauge32: 1250 > > TCP-MIB::tcpListenerProcess.ipv4."0.0.0.0".111 = Gauge32: 951 > > TCP-MIB::tcpListenerProcess.ipv4."0.0.0.0".8053 = Gauge32: 976 > > TCP-MIB::tcpListenerProcess.ipv4."0.0.0.0".43677 = Gauge32: 956 > > TCP-MIB::tcpListenerProcess.ipv4."127.0.0.1".53 = Gauge32: 976 > > TCP-MIB::tcpListenerProcess.ipv4."127.0.0.1".53 = Gauge32: 976 > > Error: OID not increasing: > > TCP-MIB::tcpListenerProcess.ipv4."127.0.0.1".53 > > >= TCP-MIB::tcpListenerProcess.ipv4."127.0.0.1".53 > > <snip> > > Please excuse bad form replying to myself. > Of course, when I invoke snmpwalk with -Cc, > the daemon's last response repeats indefinitely. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Net-snmp-users mailing list > Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users >
_______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
