On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Devin Reade wrote: > Unfortunately, that kind of defeats the purpose of the firewall, > having one or more machines (other than the firewall) connected > to both networks. Yes, but appletalk without IP suggests that someone is willing to do it anyway. Besides, the border router can be a rudimentary if not a complete firewall. I don't necessarily disagree with you, I just provide some options. This one just happens to be just as bad as what was suggested originally. Tom
- [netatalk-admins] multiple interfaces Simon Buchanan
- Re: [netatalk-admins] multiple interfaces tkaczma
- Re: [netatalk-admins] multiple interfaces Devin Reade
- Re: [netatalk-admins] multiple interfaces Patrik Schindler
- Re: [netatalk-admins] multiple interfaces Simon Buchanan
- Re: [netatalk-admins] multiple interfaces tkaczma
- Re: [netatalk-admins] multiple interfaces Patrik Schindler
