Hi,

Did you use the Mac software that came with your HP4000 to *make* the
ppd?

Alvise Nobile wrote:
> 
> I have netatalk on Linux, to act as a print-server for some macs.
> The mac's are supposed to see the printers as generic laserwriters, and
> get some details about them from the ppd provided by the server.
> It does not seem to work. Has anyone seen something like that and knows a
> workaround?. Here is my bug report:
> 
> ============================================================
> Subject:
> ============================================================
> Faulty communication of PPD contents from papd to MAC
> 
> ============================================================
> Environment:
> ============================================================
> 
> netatalk 1.4b2 on both Linux Red Hat 5.1 and 6.0
> 
>         netatalk 1.4b2+asun2.1.3-4 as distributed from RedHat contrib
>                 archive
> 
>         Linux kernel 2.2.5-15 (For RedHat 6.0 : Plain RedHat 6.0)
>         Linux kernel 2.0.34   (For Redhat 5.1)
> 
> Mac GS/3 with MacOS 8.5.1
> 
> Printers:
>         HP 4000N  (ppd from HP)
>         HP 2000C  (Windows PPD from HP)
>         Epson StylosPro 8500 (with Birmy PowerRip Postscript  stuff)
> ============================================================
> Description:
> ============================================================
> All the printers are controlled by a Linux box.
>         I want the Linux box to inform the Mac's about
>         the characteristics of the printer (colour;
>         double-sided; Postscript level; memory). (I realize
>         Double-sided is not supported, by now...)
> papd configured to advertize them to Mac clients: papd configuration file
> contains path of ppd files, ppd files downloaded from manufacturers.
> Printers are visible to the chooser, with their UNIX names, as configured
> in papd.
> One clicks 'setup' from the chooser, and then 'Autosetup'
> and then one arrives to the 'ppd selection' window. Selecting 'Generic'
> apparently everything goes well. >>>>BUT then, looking at the Printer Info,
> one gets:
> 1) For the Epson, Product name, Postscript Version and Postscript Revision ,
>    and Color Supported are right; Postscript Level is wrong (1 instead of 2),
>    all the other parameters are empty(while resolution and memory should be not)
> 2) For the HP printers, more or less all the parameters are nonsense
>    (Product Name is 22000000, which in the ppd is *FreeVM; some other numbers
>    like resolution etc are non recognizable)
> 
> The PPD for HP 4000 are the ones HP distributes the MAC.
> There are no recognizable difference
> in style between PPD's for Epson and HP.
> Using the Epson ppd file with values changed to reflect HP values works
> to the same extent as the Epson (Product OK, colour OK, not the rest)
> ================================================================
> Repeat-By
> ================================================================
> Any attempt to configure the printer as advertized by papd from the chooser
> 
> Alvise Nobile,              Scientific Computing Section
> The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics
> Address: str. Costiera 11, I-34100 Trieste, Italy
> Tel: +39-040-2240-391       Fax: +39-040-224163/224559

-- 
 
Eddie

http://www1.tpgi.com.au/users/eirvine/index.html
________________________________________________

Reply via email to