Re: [netatalk-admins] Samba/Unix File Management vs. Resource Forks?

[Clemens Anhuth]

> The issue of Win95/98 or NT clients moving NT SFM (Services for
> Macintosh)
> and losing the resource fork is related to NTFS vs. FAT
> volumes.

it does also happen when copying files to a different name in the
same directory using win95 via windows explorer over network as
well.

so it is not only related to the udnerstandable issue of being
unable to store the forks in fat16.