Don't do it man, send them to Novell first. It is much more mac friendly.
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 23:55:24 +0100
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] End the Beta!
>
> chuck schrieb:
>>
>> So this 1.4beta has gone on for 2 years. I offer that it is NOT a
>> beta. Let's rename the sucker to 1.4. Or add Mr Sun's patches and
>> call it 1.5 and be done with it. It was talked about a number of
>> months ago, and there were wish lists of things to be done. I'd say
>> that it's the most stable it's going to be. mutt has gone from
>> non-existence to release in this time. This is not a critisism, I like
>> software that just works without lots of mods. stable can be okay.
>>
>> Discuss.
> That's absolutly true! One of our clients, an advertising agency, which
> has a powerfull Linux server (256MB, 140GB RAID, Fast Ethernet, 25
> Mac's, etc.) with "netatalk-1.4b2+asun2.0a18.2-49.i386" will now change
> over to Windows NT 4.0 with MacServerIP, because I can't give them
> support on some questions coming up when we look together into the
> message logfile!!!! I have tried to get answers on SuSE-Support, but
> they support everything on Linux except NETATALK. Any question in
> mailing lists where still unanswered. And I am not alone with my
> problems. I am looking with interrest what the questions in these
> mailing lists are, and whenever there is a real problem to solve, there
> is no usefull answer. I don't know why the AppleTalk support for Linux
> is not pushed more, because it is very fast and easy to configur. But I
> can't stay the questions of my clients any longer.
>
> Uwe
>
> P.S.: I am not a freak how has plenty of time to figure out what's the
> best way to do. What I need is a system which I can sell to my clients
> to get them away from Micro$oft!
>
