I'm also seeking for a solution on that disconnetion, and I found this
solution
at www.searchlinux.com...
He give his own patch wich make certainly something interesting but also
change
the adouble.h with :
> -#define AD_DATASZ1 589
> +#define AD_DATASZ1 1024 /* was 589, linux kernels > 2.2.9 seem
to
> + have unilaterally changed this WRT
> + hfs... */
>
and finally the files which are already on my linuxbox couldn't be
recognize with
their type and application maker...
hope it's help you, and will be greatfull to find a solution...
yours
xav
> FIX: netatalk/afpd under linux>2.2.10/HFS
>
>
> Question | No Replies >
>
>
> Return to Search
> Author: Ole Craig ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Date: 1999-10-27
> Sources: comp.os.linux.networking
>
> I've seen a couple of folks report problems with netatalk
> disconnecting Mac clients when they try to mount an HFS format
device
> under newer (> 2.2.9?) versions of linux. I managed to fix this
under
> RedHat 6.1 (2.2.12) by applying a workaround posted to
> linux.debian.bugs.dist by Hideyuki Otokawa
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; for the original post see
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- dejanews
may be
> of help.
>
> The symptoms were that you could mount normal netatalk
volumes
> fine, but if you tried to mount an HFS-format partition (using
Paul
> Hargrove's HFS implementation included in 2.2.x distributions) and
> then read it via netatalk, you'd get "Connection to server was
> unexpectedly broken").
>
> I built an RPM from my fix, which also incorporated a few
> other changes in order to build under RH6.1 -- I added -lnsl to
the
> RPC libs list, and kludged a workaraund for the fact that RedHat
has
> decided to put PAM libs and header files into /lib/security and
> /usr/include/security, respectively.
>
> If anyone wants'em, feel free to dl:
>
www.cs.umass.edu/~olc/pub/netatalk-1.4b2+asun2.1.3-olc_rh61.i386.rpm
>
www.cs.umass.edu/~olc/pub/netatalk-1.4b2+asun2.1.3-olc_rh61.src.rpm
>
www.cs.umass.edu/~olc/pub/netatalk-devel-1.4b2+asun2.1.3-olc_rh61.i386.rpm
>
> Naturally, these are provided without any warranty of
> useability-or-fitness-for-a-particular-purpose whatsoever... but
they
> worked for me.
>
> poingg,
> Ole
>
> ps. I'm not on the netatalk devel list, so if someone who is wants
to
> forward this post feel free to do so.
> --
> Ole Craig * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * UNIX; postmaster, news, web; SGI
martyr *
> CS Computing Facility, UMass * <www.cs.umass.edu/~olc/> for public
key
> The postmaster misses. The postmaster hits! --more--
> You have new mail.
>
>
