on 5/31/00 19:31, Luke McNeilage at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > in a real production environment, > this fascination with aliases can easily be avoided. Don't alias your data. This avoidance of alias' is equally fascinating - what do you propose - deliberately create redundant duplicates (which is a pandora's box of problems waiting to happen). Alias are precisely of benefit to avoid redundancy, and to provide easy links to common data locations. Harry
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(RFC) Marcus Radich
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(... S.Ecker
- Re: netatalk in production environments.... Ron Chmara
- FW: netatalk in production environments....(... Luke McNeilage
- FW: netatalk in production environments....(... Luke McNeilage
- Re: netatalk in production environments.... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(... Tom Watson
- Re: netatalk in production environments.... Patrik Schindler
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(... Steve Freitas
- Re: netatalk in production environments.... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: netatalk in production environme... wesley . craig
- Re: netatalk in production envir... andrew morgan
- Re: netatalk in production ... wesley . craig
- Re: netatalk in production envir... Patrik Schindler
- [OT] [Re: netatalk in produ... thomas.riewe
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(... Steve Freitas
