What's interesting to me is the 'almost' the 'veer' of this, not sure what
you're saying is what you would be intending to say or rather the intending
seems spread, or smeared across sememes. Does that make sense? I hope so, I
intended to say this or something similar as your description comes or
drops through, throughout. Love the text! I haven't seen this before -- Alan

On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 9:49 AM Michael Szpakowski <m...@michaelszpakowski.org>
wrote:

> HI all
> I have a piece in this ( & so, thereby, does Edward Picot who was kind
> enough to allow me to remix his article on my 2011/12 *12 Remixes*
> project). Huge thanks to Edward & , of course, very interested in any
> reactions to the piece...
> with warm wishes
> michael
>
>
> We are very happy to announce the publication of our special issue for 
> *Media-N
> *(17.1), Forking Paths in New Media Art Practices: Investigating Remix
> <https://doi.org/10.21900/j.median.v17i1>, which you can read, download,
> and share:
> Vol. 17 No. 1 (2021): Forking Paths in New Media Art Practices:
> Investigating Remix | Media-N <https://doi.org/10.21900/j.median.v17i1>
>
>
> ( I tried to post this before but the list held it up because it had the
> publisher's large graphic..)
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org
> https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org
https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to