Hi all,

I just got this book last week and it has some amazing material about Leonardo 
and writing.  It compares aspects of Leonardo's process to modern artists such 
as Twombly and I believe also to a variety of theorists including Benjamin.  
The relationship of writing, speaking, and visual perception to time is a focus 
as well.

In studying Leonardo's notebooks last month, specifically the Paris 
Manuscripts, I noticed a funny kind of character Leonardo seemed to use as a 
"signature" of sorts in the notebooks at either the start or end of the 
notebook or both.  It started off in the earlier MS's (there are about a dozen) 
like a scrolling S with a line segment bisecting it.  It later evolves to a 
variety of forms, some like a cursive L with a circle at the end, or just a 
circle with a line through it, etc.

In any case, in Leonardo's Paradox by Joost Keizer he discusses many passages 
from Leonardo's writings comparing writing to drawing, the relationship of 
speech to words and images, and the role of the body in writing in pen and ink 
(as opposed to the printed word).  Overall it's just a fascinating book and I'm 
only done with the first chapter.

Keizer includes an amazing story about Dante I'd never heard.  In the Convivio, 
or Banquet, kind of a compendium of knowledge Dante wrote before the Commedia, 
Dante sets forth a theory about language as a system of knots.  Letters are 
variations of knotted line segments, which are knotted into words, then into 
sentences, etc.  To illustrate he cites the archaic word "auieo," meaning "to 
tie words together," from which the word "author" is derived.  He goes on to 
show that auieo, derivation unknown, is a knot made of the vowels A, E, I, O, 
U, a line drawn through them in the order of first, last, middle, second, 
fourth.  This knot is illustrated in the Convivio IV.vi, link below, and shares 
several similarities with the "signature" symbols of the Paris Manuscripts.

Keizer also discusses a very interesting Leonardo quote I had never heard 
before:  In the ideal world the painter "sits in front of [their] work with 
great ease, well-dressed and wielding the lightest brush with charming colors.  
[Their] clothing is ornamented according to [their] pleasure."  It requires too 
much of a stretch not to get the metaphor, especially since it was Leonardo who 
created a separate study area or studio separate from the bustling workshop 
(bottega) in which his books and writing materials were kept and to which he 
could retreat for peace and quiet.  Very interesting too is how he organized 
this space of seclusion, which was very similar to the office of a notary 
(writer of contracts) like his father and grandfather were, and that an 
artist's studio became the modern norm.  He also used a variation of the 
handwriting style of notaries in his notebooks using many of their conventions 
for abbreviation, authentication, and so forth.

Even more strange is the light in which all this puts the bridge in the Mona 
Lisa, since it forms a primary visual chiasm of the work.

All best,

Max

https://archive.org/details/convivioofdantea00dantiala/page/252/mode/2up

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Paris_Manuscripts_(Leonardo_da_Vinci)

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to