This is just plain great.
Kind of Borgesian but with a more down to earth
satirical edge...
I would love to see this as a movie, an illustrated
lecture...
m.
--- Ruth Catlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Proposal for the Galapagos Tortoise Messaging
> Network
> 
> > 
> 
> Legitimate Transfer Protocols
> Legitimate Transfer Protocols for use by the
> Galapagos Tortoise 
> Messaging Network are categorised as follows:-
> 
> a) those authorised by the head of state, b) those
> referred to in myth 
> and legend, c) those recommended by W3C
> http://www.w3.org/, d) 
> breastfeeding, e) telepathy, f) fabulous ones, g)
> those employing 
> trained or wild animals, h) those that are included
> in this 
> classification, i) those accompanied by a quickness
> of breath, j) those 
> that transmit in an instant to an infinite number of
> recipients, k) 
> those that can be described in diagrams created
> using computer 
> software, l) others, m) those that have just sent
> unsolicited 
> advertisements to a huge database of individuals n)
> those that are so 
> slow that the recipient assumes them to be faulty.
> (1)
> 
> Contemporary digital messaging services
> 
> Contemporary digital messaging services are sold for
> their speed, ease 
> of use and ‘real-time’ communication between the
> sender and 
> recipient.(2) The nature of the message is
> constrained by the protocols 
> developed to facilitate business and other socially
> acceptable 
> exchanges. The transfer protocol and the message
> that is sent are 
> treated as distinct and independent from one
> another. Any unpredicted 
> alteration (embellishment or partial destruction) of
> a message in 
> transit is considered a failure of protocol.
> Conduits and protocols are 
> the trusted chaperones of messages that might
> otherwise be promiscuous, 
> visceral, dissipated, loving or useful in a way that
> has not already 
> been determined. It is supposed that the ideal
> conditions in which 
> ‘free’ messaging can take place, is across secure,
> frictionless 
> apolitical conduits. ‘A Free Network? is defined by
> what its users can 
> do with it, rather than the particular technology it
> is built on’.(3)
> 
> GTMN
> 
> GTMN challenges this instrumental approach to
> contemporary Western 
> communication. Opposing the culture of instant
> communications, it 
> reaches backwards and forwards through time to
> promote slow concerns 
> amongst friends. It guards against fast solutions to
> slow burning 
> personal or community problems that may require a
> subtle shift of 
> behaviour and attitudes in individuals or groups. By
> aggregating the 
> qualities and effects of 3 GTMN transfer protocols,
> employed in relay, 
> each message is infused with a cocktail of
> life-force particular to its 
> modes of delivery.
> 
>      * Communication is unpredictable in its
> behaviour as well as the 
> effects on the sender, the message, the network and
> the recipient.
>      * The message may be a long time in transit.
>      * Success of communication is variably
> dependent on the sender’s 
> ingenuity, favourable conditions and the recipient’s
> openness to the 
> message and the form that it takes.
>      * All messages undergo some physical
> reconstitution/translation.
>      * The message and the medium may merge and
> exchange roles.
> 
> How it works
> 
>      * A GTMN device randomly selects 3 protocols
> from the 14 categories 
> of legitimate GTMN transport protocols (see top)
> These may piggy-back 
> on existing transit systems.
>      * The sender devises a way of ensuring
> successful interfacing 
> between the 3 stages of the message’s delivery
>      * The message is sent
>      * The message is mutated through time space and
> matter
>      * After some time the message may be received
> 
> GTMN
> 
> supplies the devices for randomly selecting 3
> protocols for sending 
> messages and takes no responsibility for content
> contained in messages. 
> GTMN makes no claims of fitness for purpose or for
> the unforeseen 
> consequences of GTmessaging to senders or recipients
> or third parties.
> 
> NOTES:
> 
> 1) Adapted from J.L. Borges’ categorisation scheme
> of an ancient 
> Chinese Encylopedia entitled Celestial Emporium of
> Benevolent 
> Knowledge, as quoted by Kevin Kelly, Out of Control
> 
> 2) MSN® Messenger for Mac version 4.0.1 offers
> ‘rapid response times’. 
> Emoticons let ‘your know how you really feel’ along
> with ‘new security 
> features that keep pace with your need to share
> ideas in real time.’ 
>
http://www.microsoft.com/mac/default.aspx?pid=msnmessenger
> 
> 3) Free Networks?.org is a volunteer cooperative
> association dedicated 
> to education, collaboration, and advocacy for the
> creation of Free 
> Networks?. http://www.freenetworks.org
> 
> 4) Slowness and Networks This article starts to
> explore various 
> scenarios involving piggy-backing on
> less-than-instant transit systems 
> http://www.test.org.uk/archives/000278.html
> 
> ----------------------------
> Anyone want to help me realise this?
> : ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))Ruth
> 
> Furtherfield - http://www.furtherfield.org
> HTTP - http://www.http.uk.net
> Node.London - http://www.nodel.org
> 
> Unit A2, 71, Ashfield Road
> London N4 1NY
> +44 (0) 208 8022827
> > _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
>
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> 

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to