Clive, You're entitled to your opinion that my post was witless and dull. Can't deny I wasn't taken back by it. But you're mistaken to think I was being disagreeable or hostile. Initially I was irritated by the tiniest of amounts by Sim hijacking a non DIWO thread by a newcomer to the list, until having the (dull & witless?) idea to pretend his cutup version made actual sense and to reply as if it made sense, in the style of an arrogant jerk. Perhaps not one of my better ideas :)
James. On 9/2/2007, "Clive McCarthy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Libel not Slander > > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity" ><[email protected]> >Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 9:14 PM >Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] RE: DIWO_new Thursday Club (snip) > > >> Well, this list is an experiment, and not a critical forum for slander.., but >> http://www.slanderous.org is looking for people just like you. >> Could you build on the witless and dull motifs? I think we may have a new >> headline for the next issue. >> I would LOVE some visuals for the journal. >> Please address all slander and general misanthropy to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> we'd love to promote your ideas, >> Eric (for Joe Edit) >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NetBehaviour mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
