Hi Brad,
> What is happening in the field of artistic creation is spreading to
everyday life.
The more that 'artistic creation' is merged between art and life, then
the more of a possibility for others outside of various groups/circles
to claim their own territories - whether this be collectively or
individually.
>Breaks in meaning, if only in the way we express our thoughts, cannot
emerge; they are cut off by the modelization of interpretation which
precedes them.
I feel that interpretation (possible interference) before the growth of
actual ideas is a valid point. I did as paper called 'reclaiming the
artists' identity' in 96, and toured the country at various venues
reading to art students mainly - proposing that they defy the canons of
what their institutions were informing them. I asked them and to create
their own groups and invent their own histories...
If people within and outside institutions begin to relearn in respect of
mutual negotiations beyond top-down agendas, I do not see a problem with
this. After all, the world is not as easy as a binary set of values -
even though some would prefer us all to think on these terms alone,
rather allow us to appreciate the very-real complexities of life and the
gunky bits in between.
marc
CALL FOR NO PAPERS
==================
What is happening in the field of artistic creation is spreading
to everyday life. Breaks in meaning, if only in the way we express our
thoughts, cannot emerge; they are cut off by the modelization of
interpretation which precedes them. This terrorism is founded on an
infinite illusion, wherein all the different possible meanings of
creation are the reflection of institutionalized speech.
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
