Dear Byrd

How interesting that you find your post to have been a success.

You do not describe the picture of Australia that I get from the BBC; and I 
listen to the BBC (radio) a great deal, often tutting about intentional or 
unintentional biases. I am not aware of any racial discrimination against 
Australians.

My main point was to suggest that Australia may not be the lone beacon you 
made it out to be.

"Poms" is an Australian term of racial abuse, not British

There is some concern here in some quarters about outward migration; but 
generally the response is to criticise the lack of attractiveness of UK as a 
place to live. Or so it seems to me. I don't pay much attention. I do not 
think it exercises the BBC management much. The BBC are cowardly sometimes, 
yes; but it is more subtle than that. The world service is funded by our 
Foreign Office, I believe, and they tend to be more critical of UK than the 
"independent" BBC itself. Yet the idea that the BBC is painting a false 
picture of Australia to discourage British migrants is quite literally 
fantastic. I find the idea parochial.

I cannot judge whether or not the BBC presents a grossly inaccurate picture 
of Australia as I have not been to Australia; but I am not aware of being 
given any particularly adverse portrait of the country. I haven't seen 
Neighbours for some years - is it still running? - but it is I believe an 
Australian production. In so far as it presents any credible view, I'd say 
that urban Australia is much the same and - in general - as mentally vapid 
as urban UK.

I think that - in general - poms realise that back packer murders in 
Australia are rare; and, if we thought about it, sociologically rather 
similar to murders here.

The only people I have ever heard mention convict ancestors - apart from 
appearances in some novels - is from Australians visiting UK.

That seems to have decreased greatly over recent decades; as does the rather 
confusing description of UK as "home" by people born in Perth or Adelaide or 
Hobart or Melbourne or Sydney or Brisbane or even Darwin. (I have named 
state capitals round your sunburnt coasts in order to demonstrate that I 
have a basic grasp of Australian geography.)

As to "uncultured and illiterate", I do not hear that much. It is there, 
yes; but in small measure and partly encouraged and mostly manifested by 
Barry Humphries' Les Patterson. Not a British creation. Yes, he does appear 
on our TV; but then so does a lot of shit.

Regarding being uncultured and illiterate, have you met many Brits? The 
nearest I have come to hearing that of Australians has come from Australian 
poets and artists who have left Australia.

We do occasionally hear about shark attacks, yes. But we have shark 
sightings here. The latest has been in our newspaper silly season. Most of 
our sharks eat little things; attacks are rarer than they are in your 
waters. We know that, compared to us, you have dodgy sharks and poisonous 
spiders. This sense was recently expanded by an Australian who was bitten to 
death by, I believe, a crocodile; I do not believe the BBC made that up, but 
the general feeling was that he died because he was an arrogant showman. 
Such animals make you a little bit exotic to us perhaps; but the pictures I 
have seen make Australia look rather like urban USA to me; not a dangerous 
wilderness. (I have, I believe, been in greater danger from animals in 
northern Scandinavia than I might be in Australia.) Of the many people I 
know who live in or visit Australia, I know of none who are greatly 
exercised about sharks etc; nor do they extrapolate about your politics and 
certainly not in a racist way from the fact that you have sharks which 
occasionally bite people. The sharks would, wouldn't they..

Misapprehension does not equate with racism. It may be a symptom; it may not 
be

It is not true that shark attacks and the other things you list is the only 
news of Australia that  is ever reported. Methinks the person doth protest 
too much.

We hear many things which I believe are very good about Australia. We also 
hear about your prime minister brown-nosing Washington and acting as 
unenlightened. The only conclusion I draw from that is that most electorates 
are, in majority, air heads, unfortunate as that may be for one who believes 
ideologically in extending the franchise.

We hear that the whites have been beastly to the aboriginal Australians; but 
then into the 70s the Swedes were being beastly to the Same; and the UK 
continues to be neglectful at least and often beastly to the Roma, or 
whatever the correct name is this year. I mention 2 countries I know quite 
well. I conclude it is probably the same the whole world over

> where are you getting your info on the Aus govt?

from a variety of news reports
from Australians here, many personal friends
from Australians there, many personal friends

> this european racist bias is one of the subtexts of the bellebyrd blog

What European racist bias? Individuals maybe. Special pleas won't stop it.

There is more than a special plea in what you have written and you make a 
lot of unevidenced assumptions; but perhaps you will dismiss me as 
prejudiced for saying that. I'd counsel caution. You sound one stage off 
crying "the greatest country in the world"; and look what happened the last 
time they started that

> re our anti discrimination record, the blog features a recent report
> that cites Australia as a world leader in gender equality

Well, against such a clinching argument, I had best be silent; the proofs 
overwhelm me; but I wasn't actually disputing it; I expressed surprise. I 
also suggested that to claim anti-discrimination law is sadly lacking 
elsewhere is untrue. It may be less good elsewhere; but that is something 
else. Perhaps I shouldn't have said two separate things in one email

The surprise arose from the oddity of such a reactionary government pursuing 
gender equality. Inconsistency to my mind; unless it is equality of gender 
to facilitate commercial exploitation of the relatively weak. Equality is a 
good start but it is hardly liberation. While having both genders free to 
behave and acquire the same would be a start, and would be pleasant for the 
individuals, it is only a start and leaves and even creates other 
inequalities

I certainly wouldn't want to dispute Australia's world leadership in 
anything. When I hear the words "world" and "leadership" in combination, I 
reach for my ear plugs

I shall go silent again now

all best

L

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out how you can get spam free email.
http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/3

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to