edward's post reminded me of this earlier post from marc. "distant" is clearly Netart 2.0 as well as Net art, net art, netart, net-art, net_art and possibly even net.art but then that would disqualify it from being Netart 2.0 ... but maybe it's not Netart 2.0 anyway if it's dependent on the web ...
>Hi everyone, > >Just discovered Pall Thayer's own Manifesto on Net Art, which I presume >is regarding is reflecting his own practice and connecting to >contemporary networked culture and Net Art as well. > >Just wondering what others thought about this? > >marc > >Netart 2.0: A Manifesto of Variable Manifestation >Initial draft October 18, 2006 > >Netart 2.0 is not net.art > >Netart 2.0 is dynamic > >Netart 2.0 cannot function without an active network connection > >Netart 2.0 may or may not be interactive > >Netart 2.0 may or may not be accessible on-line > >Netart 2.0 must appeal to at least one of the human senses > >Netart 2.0 reflects contemporary culture > >Netart 2.0 is not epic > >Netart 2.0 is not science > >Netart 2.0 is historically grounded > >Netart 2.0 cannot function without electricity > >Netart 2.0 is automated > >Netart 2.0 is not virtual > >Netart 2.0 is not dependent upon The World Wide Web > >no copyright >Pall Thayer > >http://pallit.lhi.is/netart_2_0.html >_______________________________________________ >NetBehaviour mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour -- ____________________________________________________________ helen varley jamieson: creative catalyst [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.creative-catalyst.com http://www.avatarbodycollision.org http://www.upstage.org.nz http://www.writerfind.com/hjamieson.htm ____________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
