Hi Dave & Patrick,

Yes I remember this piece and liked it.

Perhaps, as a way of getting an audience to view your strips (if 
regular), would be to offer the same strips again to visitors, where 
they can also fill in their own text/versions into the speach bubbles.

marc


hi patrick and marc
Thanks for all the feedback - this is great!
I have wondered if I should open up the work more - make it
collaborative - as i always want to share the creation.
I have got a cartoon generator that I built last year:
http://davemiller.org/projects/cartoon_generator/
and maybe I could tie it in with this?
dave

2008/7/9 marc garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
 > > Hi Patrick & Dave,
 > >
 > > Your idea reminds me Andy Deck's project 'Panel Junction', it is of
 > > course very different in respect of content, but the behaviour could be
 > > similar...
 > >
 > > Panel Junction combines the graphic novel with forms of shared
 > > authorship that have been made possible by the Internet.
 > > http://artcontext.org/act/07/panel/
 > >
 > > marc
 > >
 > > Hi Dave and all
 > > Would it be a good idea to leave one speech bubble blank for ner
 > > behaviourists to fill in?
 > > or not...
 > > just a thought
 > > bw
 > > Patrick
 > >
 > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:23 PM, dave miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > > wrote:
 > >
 > > Hi marc
 > >
 > > I'm going to have a go - it needs to be a regular thing I agree, as it
 > > would have much more impact than a one-off. I could probably manage
 > > one per week!
 > >
 > > cheers, dave
 > >
 > > 2008/7/9 marc garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
 > > > Hi Dave,
 > > >
 > > > I was wondering if there was a more regular pattern of work 
whether we
 > > > could look forward to a weekly or bi-weekly edition?
 > > >
 > > > marc
 > > >> hi marc
 > > >>
 > > >> Thanks for having a look. I'm exploring a few different comic
 > > ideas at
 > > >> the moment, and if one pops out that seems to work, I'll try to keep
 > > >> it going regularly. You're right, there is a sort of journalistic
 > > >> flavour to my work, I think I need to recognise this more. I'll keep
 > > >> you posted on new installments!
 > > >>
 > > >> cheers, dave
 > > >>
 > > >> 2008/7/9 marc garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
 > > >>
 > > >>> Hi Dave,
 > > >>>
 > > >>> Yes, it made me titter. It is interesting how much of your work
 > > seems to
 > > >>> maintain a flavour of newspaper journalism, somehow.
 > > >>>
 > > >>> Are these strips a regular, or occasional?
 > > >>>
 > > >>> marc
 > > >>>
 > > >>>
 > > >>>
 > > >>>> thanks michael!
 > > >>>> dave
 > > >>>>
 > > >>>> 2008/7/8 Michael Szpakowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
 > > >>>>
 > > >>>>
 > > >>>>> it made *me* laugh :)
 > > >>>>> I like your drawing style & you hit the creepiness of the new
 > > toryism rather well. It's miles better than the ones they have in the
 > > Guardian when Steve Bell isn't there...
 > > >>>>> michael
 > > >>>>>
 > > >>>>>
 > > >>>>> --- On Tue, 7/8/08, dave miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 > > >>>>>
 > > >>>>>
 > > >>>>>
 > > >>>>>> From: dave miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > > >>>>>> Subject: [NetBehaviour] the ruling classes
 > > >>>>>> To: "NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity"
 > > <[email protected]>
 > > >>>>>> Date: Tuesday, July 8, 2008, 8:13 PM
 > > >>>>>> I made this today:
 > > >>>>>> http://davemiller.org/comix/rc_08_07_08.gif
 > > >>>>>>
 > > >>>>>> would it make a decent series? It's very London-centric
 > > >>>>>> I realise
 > > >>>>>> thanks, dave
 > > >>>>>> _______________________________________________
 > > >>>>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
 > > >>>>>> [email protected]
 > > >>>>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
 > > >>>>>>
 > > >>>>>>
 > > >>>>> _______________________________________________
 > > >>>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
 > > >>>>> [email protected]
 > > >>>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
 > > >>>>>
 > > >>>>>
 > > >>>>>
 > > >>>> _______________________________________________
 > > >>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
 > > >>>> [email protected]
 > > >>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
 > > >>>>
 > > >>>>
 > > >>>>
 > > >>> _______________________________________________
 > > >>> NetBehaviour mailing list
 > > >>> [email protected]
 > > >>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
 > > >>>
 > > >>>
 > > >> _______________________________________________
 > > >> NetBehaviour mailing list
 > > >> [email protected]
 > > >> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
 > > >>
 > > >>
 > > >
 > > > _______________________________________________
 > > > NetBehaviour mailing list
 > > > [email protected]
 > > > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
 > > >
 > > _______________________________________________
 > > NetBehaviour mailing list
 > > [email protected]
 > > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
 > >
 > >
 > >
 > >
 > > _______________________________________________
 > > NetBehaviour mailing list
 > > [email protected]
 > > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
 > > _______________________________________________
 > > NetBehaviour mailing list
 > > [email protected]
 > > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
 > >
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to