mark cooley wrote: > The average citizen probably has much less of a chance getting sued for using > copyrighted material.
Their work can be removed from the internet without the need for the expense of a lawsuit, though. There are plenty of examples of this from YouTube. > It's probably precisely because it is a Hollywood that the lawsuit was filed. Yes, but this is because there is no DMCA takedown procedure to censor hollywood movie releases. > Of course the film's idiotic content most likely offended Ono as well. This cannot be an issue for freedom of speech. For those of us who oppose the bogus politics of Intelligent Design it's important to recognise that the way the film company handled the release of this film has done far more damage to their cause than it being suppressed would have. ;-) - Rob.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
