There's a difference between the ideology of doing science and science
itself; most scientists tend to take somewhat of an idealist viewpoint. As
far as science as ideology - science is based on experiment - as David
Finkelstein once said, you're fucking reality and you don't know what will
come back; even cosmology is based on testability (see On Space and Time,
Cambridge, or Susskind's or Smolin's works, not to mention any of the
physics/cosmology courses you can download on utube). Things such as the
tachyon theory (I interviewed the discoverer of that) prove false and are
mostly dropped; things like Einstein's cosmological constant return in
other guises through the mathematics. You might as well call everything
ideological, in which case the word uses meaning - science works through
testifiable premises, and gets corrupted when people like Lysenko batter
the results for ideological purposes.
- Alan
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, mark cooley wrote:
i agree with Michael here.? There needs to be some criticism of
enlightenment ideology. As was stated, it's not too difficult to
criticize religion as strictly ideological, but if we can apply Marx's
critique of ideology to many other realms - including science. The
definition of ideology that I like and comes from Marx's line of
thought, specifically Althusser is - habits, values and beliefs that are
assumed to be natural.? This definition is not limited to religion and
would include the natural sciences of course. Religion is ideological
but so is science - that is if you take a Marxist / Poststructuralist
perspective. When folks pit the against one another as if they're doing
battle they're missing this point.
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 09:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Michael Szpakowski <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] questions of faith
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
??? <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
I think Marx had it right:
"Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world and
the soul of soulless conditions."
Look
at the strength of the attraction of religion for the poor, the
dispossessed , the wretched of the earth...( "Pie in the Sky when you
Die" as Joe Hill had it)
The danger with the uber rationalists, the
Dawkins &c, is that they are not neutral seekers after truth but
ideologues of militant liberalism and as with all liberals they claim
to be ideology free but they end up supporting the status quo -here in
particular offering intellectual succour to the Islamophobes at a time
when Islamophobia is the principal and most potent form of racism in UK
society.
They are also in general horribly smug, as if being opposed
to religion is such a terribly difficult and demanding thing to do,
when of course it costs no serious political commitment, risk or effort
at all.
I'm an atheist and ultimately opposed to religious ideas
but I don't believe religion is currently the main enemy? - capitalism
, imperialism and the consequent drive to war are. When I hear the
supporters of the Iraq war, the Straws, the Blunketts, the Blairs use
defence of the enlightenment arguments to ,for example, bash Moslem
woman who choose to wear traditional dress I both reach for my sick bag
and I know precisely which side I'm on.
Just as a matter of
interest here's a little film, transmuted into gif format, I made of
young Moslem women on the defend Palestine demonstration earlier this
year -they don't look too oppressed or incapacitated by their manifest
religious belief to me...
http://www.somedancersandmusicians.com/from_the_river_to_the_sea/index.html
michael
PS
and just to be ecumenical about it, it's certainly been the case that
on the whole the Church of England leadership has been *far to the
left* of all the mainstream political parties on most (not all, it's
nuanced) social and political issues for about the last ten years...
| Alan Sondheim Mail archive: http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
| Webpage (directory) at http://www.alansondheim.org
| [email protected], [email protected], tel US 718-813-3285
! http://www.facebook.com/alan.sondheim
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
