I'm quoting 4chan, not Mondo Lite (or Wired as it insists on calling itself...)
Net neutrality doesn't mean ignoring denial of service attacks, although it does mean identifying them competently. Both parties failed here, and both parties have admitted it. On Jul 28, 2009 1:39 PM, "mez breeze" <[email protected]> wrote: hey rob + all, ...as i tweeted earlier re Wired attempt 2 paint the block simply as a 4chan fail [ http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/07/4chan/ ] rather than having wider impacts 4 net_neutrality in gen [comments = innaresting]: - "that's WIRED 4 ya @labfly: moot sez 4chan has been DDoSed+ AT&T block without notification *or* clarification+it's *still* moots fault? wha?..." - "...seems @labfly like a typical condescending response via a mediachan determined 2 relegate /b/ 2 a *only juv[p]enile*>meaningless state?" - "+MOAR [heh] interested @labfly in upcoming "moot-nus": http://www.4chan.org/news/ + impacts on net_neutrality[selloutsville ahoy? xpansion?]" /m/ On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Rob Myers<[email protected]> wrote: > http://status.4chan.org/ind... > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > netbehavi...@netbeha...
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
