The uninhabitable zone is a socially unacceptable but densely populated space.  
Due to these qualifications it is essential in order to define, describe and 
expand the area of the Subject. The process is reversible because no matter how 
excluded the interfering infrastructure of the Subject is  from the contract, 
it is accepted as a derivative so the periphery and the rejected, the excluded 
(Verwrenfung) become one surface on the Body of society.  To live in Verwerfung 
is to live in a de-territorialized discontinuity, schizophrenically and machine 
like, advocating plurality as an act of creativity and thus a language of 
critique. We can not avoid hegemony/ the mainstream, we can only submit to it 
speeding up the end, accepting and going into transformations as synthetic 
requirements of the madness of illogical practice. In the gray, ghettoized, 
utopian non-democratic zones language buzzes and is wedged. The 
image/personality/subject/identity is autistic, rejected, isolated, unnecessary 
and thus it is unavoidably satisfied, optimistic because it steals language 
(the language of skills, the language of foreigners, the language of 
psychology, the language of a nation, the language of economy, the language of 
new technologies, forgotten languages, the languages of all possible 
alienation) it intensifies its satisfaction and in a Riemann's  surface departs 
and extinguishes itself like exhaustion and a decision a machine would make. 

...MANIK...2003...
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to