One of Facebook's many problems, but it extends to just about all
social networks that allow for closed social groups.

On 10 August 2010 22:52, manik <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...IMO...PEOPLE WILL FIND WAY TO FIND EACH OTHER...THAT EVEN COULD BE
> SOMETHING ALMOST NEW...FACEBOK HAVE EVERY SYMPTOM TO BECAME PARADIGMATIC FOR
> NEW TOTALITARIAN SOCIETY/SOCIETY WHO INCLUDE ANGLO-SAXON TERRITORY WITH
> NEW...'COLONIES' AND SPREAD INFLUENCE ALL OVER THE WORLD/...FACEBOK TREAT
> HIS MEMBERSHIP LIKE LAWBREAKERS IN ADVANCE...CONSEQUENCE'S THAT ANY KIND OF
> COMMON INTEREST COULDN'T BE THEME BETWEEN FACEBOOK AND THEIR
> MEMBERSHIP...ONLY ONE IS QUILT...THIS ONE'S NOT
> 'FACE'...MANIK...AUGUST...2010...
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rob Myers" <[email protected]>
> To: "NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity"
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 8:27 PM
> Subject: [NetBehaviour] The trouble with Facebook for organizing
>
>
> "As the dominant online social network, Facebook is place where
> activists and organizers head to help their movements and ideas spread.
> People are already on Facebook, and can share discussions, events,
> actions, with their networks of friends. This is great. But there’s a
> pretty serious problem, it seems to me, in the use of Facebook for
> organizing. It’s hard to get to know people on Facebook."
>
> http://www.alevin.com/?p=2425
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
> __________ NOD32 4979 (20100328) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to