"minorities" = discrimination 
 Such old fashioned language!

m.

On 14 Nov 2010, at 12:28, De wraak van Baltassar Geraards wrote:

> "Yelling at deaf people trying to lip read" is impolite, I certainly agree
> 
> Relating artistic endeavours with the social behaviour and  the more general 
> problematic political system of minorities on the other hand is beyond my 
> comprehension 
> 
> Andreas Maria Jacobs
> 
> w: http://www.nictoglobe.com
> w: http://burgerwaanzin.nl
> 
> On 13 Nov 2010, at 18:12, martin mitchell <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> no different from yelling at people who are deaf but trying to lip read.
>> 
>> martin
>> 
>> On 13 Nov 2010, at 15:13, De wraak van Baltassar Geraards wrote:
>> 
>>>> As for Andreas .... sounds like elitist bollocks.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I presume you ment my post?
>>> 
>>> Bit of a narrow-sighted opinion, or should I say a dyslectic opinion?
>>> 
>>> Andreas Jacobs
>>> 
>>> w: http://www.nictoglobe.com
>>> w: http://burgerwaanzin.nl
>>> 
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> 
>>>> From: martin mitchell <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: 13 November 2010 15:31:47 CET
>>>> To: ajaco c/o bid <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: La Resocialiste - Edition International
>>>> 
>>>> Interesting full on eyeball visuals, different to simply reading emails.
>>>> 
>>>> As for Andreas .... sounds like elitist bollocks.
>>>> 
>>>> martin
>>>> On 13 Nov 2010, at 13:17, ajaco c/o bid wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Martin et al.
>>>>> 
>>>>> What do you think of the accesibility of the following (art)website:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://burgerwaanzin.nl
>>>>> 
>>>>> La Resocialiste Edition International
>>>>> 
>>>>> ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I purposely disrupt the readability of the constituent texts as part of
>>>>> the artistic process.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I do not think that is riduculous or insulting for visible impaired 
>>>>> persons.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Or should I not do that, considering the possibility that a visible
>>>>> impaired has a look.
>>>>> 
>>>>> So I put a textbox in braille!!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Not for the visible impaired!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Would that ease your mind?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Andreas
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Has anyone thought of the visual consequences for visually impaired
>>>>>> people, blue type on such a yellow background is very difficult for me to
>>>>>> read, daft as the previous grey background. Think of of disability web
>>>>>> standards they do exist, for an artists/creatives email site to display
>>>>>> such behaviour is ridiculous, please have plain white background with
>>>>>> black type.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> martin...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 13 Nov 2010, at 12:39, marc garrett wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Fung-Lin,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Much Thanks...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Here's the original link http://tinyurl.com/24zqlu8
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> marc
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> R.I.P Henryk Gorecki
>>>>>>>> http://www.mutanteggplant.com/vitro-nasu/2010/11/12/r-i-p-henryk-gorecki/
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> F.L.
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to