YES! Armin - brilliant article!

On 10 December 2010 13:00, marc garrett <[email protected]> wrote:
> The Return of King Mob.
>
> By Armin Medosch.
>
> The student demonstrations against the rise of tuition fees, the fourth
> of which took place yesterday, 9 December 2010 signals the return of
> King Mob to the streets of London.
>
> King Mob was the name of a British Situationist splinter group formed in
> the early 1970s which took its name from the Gordon Riots of June 1780,
> in which rioters daubed the slogan "His Majesty King Mob"' on the walls
> of Newgate prison, after gutting the building, Wikipedia informs us. The
> significance is unmissable that in an episode of last nights running
> battles between protesters and police the car of the heir to the throne
> and his wife was attacked. The police tactic of kettling badly misfired
> as some of those who escaped the kettle vented their anger on shops in
> Oxford street and the car of the royals. There was even some rumour of
> some looting going on, reported by BBC news, but later not followed up.
> The attack on the royals, a remnant of a feudal order, entirely
> parasitic in its continued exploitation of land-ownership, could be as
> significant as the death of Lady Di in a car crash which was like an
> enactment of J.G.Ballard's novel Crash. As much as the princess 'killed'
> by the media was the emblematic image of the previous era, the prince
> and his wife haunted by fear of the hydra-like mob could become the
> emblematic image of the new one. As the youth of England discovers that
> it has been robbed of its future by a government nobody has voted for,
> implementing policies never discussed and not agreed by a majority of
> people, which is then called 'democratic' by the prime minister because
> a majority of the stooges of capitalism voted for it in a house called
> Parliament, students detect the pleasure of direct action and
> extra-parliamentary opposition. While only too predictably the focus of
> the media is on 'violence' - as if the cuts themselves were not violent,
> 80% cuts to the overall teaching budget, 100% cuts in the arts and
> humanities - it was a pleasure to hear those very clear voices of young
> people who defended their decision to protest undeterred from the BBC
> reporter's insistence on the question if they condoned violence or not.
> The 'violence' question has taken on a kind of ritualistic significance
> on TV. You are certainly not allowed to say 'yes, the violence is good,
> it helps our aims' as with all the anti-terror legislation now in place
> you could become victim of breaking certain laws against 'support of
> criminal activity'. The young people drawn into the spotlight of the
> camera nevertheless got their message through. Look, we are all working
> class people here, said the Asian schoolgirl. This is not just about
> cuts, however deemed necessary or not, but an ideologically driven
> reshuffle of the higher education system which is now becoming a market,
> as the income of universities - and departments - will directly depend
> on contingent decision making of 'customers' - their prospective
> students. While the government dares to call this system 'progressive'
> the Asian schoolkid was clear that maybe people coming from poorer
> backgrounds also wanted to study arts and humanities, where they could
> hardly expect to ever earn enough to pay back the huge loans soon
> necessary to study in the UK.
>
> more...
> http://www.thenextlayer.org/node/1347
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to