On 20/12/10 11:53, James Morris wrote: > > Regarding collaboration... Is it a popularity contest?
Possibly. The problem is that collaborative production is the key to Open Source's claims of increased economic efficiency. People seem incapable of focussing on the freedom of individual human beings (the subject of Marxism apart from anything else...). They rush towards "gift economies", "peer production", "collaboration", "crowdsourcing", "the commons" and any other social or economic epiphenomena that will evaporate or become exploitative without an underlying commitment to individual freedom. On 20/12/10 12:46, xDxD.vs.xDxD wrote: > > whenever i develop something i took the habit of sticking a GPL2 > license on it and publishing it. Automatically and without thinking > about it for a single second. Do upgrade to the GPL3 if you can. :-) On 20/12/10 13:11, James Morris wrote: > I find it curious that the OSI choose to play down the importance of freedom? Their founding purpose was to avoid mentioning freedom. It was scaring the straights. - Rob. _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
