Yes, but the privilege is something anyone who has an interest in online 
work can learn about, participate in; the incestuousness isn't really 
there - there are various groups which collaborate within and without, 
Furtherfield being one of course; as far as incrowd goes, that's more of a 
conference thing, not online - in any case I've found myself and others 
almost always welcomed - these worlds just aren't that large or important 
in the long run - as far as concepts are mistaken for art - I'm not sure I 
could articulate the similarities or differences - certainly concept art 
was an intermingling - while concepts might not be art per se, there's 
certainly an aesthetics at work -

On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Rob Myers wrote:

> On 08/02/11 23:50, Andreas Maria Jacobs wrote:
>>
>> Is netbehaviour is becoming a privileged platform for the same
>> incestuous incrowd as always is the case when concepts are mistaken
>> for art?
>
> No.
>
> - Rob.
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
>


==
email archive: http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
webpage http://www.alansondheim.org
music archive: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
current text http://www.alansondheim.org/qw.txt
==
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to