Hi - I did file; I'm waiting to hear back. But I doubt there will be any 
satisfaction from either Google or Viacom.

- Alan, thanks


On Sat, 26 Mar 2011, Simon Biggs wrote:

> The other site says:
>
> This video has been removed as a violation of YouTube's policy against spam,
> scams, and commercially deceptive content.
> Sorry about that.
>
> Clearly somebody thought the content was inappropriate.
>
> Feel sorry for people in Australia. They are cut off from a huge amount of
> content due to routine morally driven filtering. Even in the UK we are cut
> off from a lot of material. Much of it is probably illegally produced
> (involving doing horrible things to people) but it is still censorship.
>
> What you are doing is nothing like that. You should be able to file a
> counter-notice.
>
> Best
>
> Simon
>
>
> On 25/03/2011 23:03, "Alan Sondheim" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> This is what's been happening so far -
>>
>>
>> Re: Termination of my YouTube account:
>>
>> Update: I just filed a claim against them for the Viacom / sutra tape; the
>> other tape - I have no idea, since I can't access the site to see what
>> they're objecting to.
>>
>> - Alan
>>
>>
>> Here's the documentation: They haven't replied yet:
>>
>>
>> First, their email:
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: YouTube Support <[email protected]>
>> Date: Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:18 PM
>> Subject: Re: [#783740898] Account Inquiry
>> To: [email protected]
>>
>>
>> Hi asondheim,
>>
>> Thanks for your email. Your "asondheim" account has been suspended due to
>> repeated or severe violations of our Terms of Use and claims of copyright
>> infringement. Suspended accounts cannot be reinstated. Federal law
>> requires that we terminate accounts when there are repeated claims of
>> copyright infringement.
>>
>> Because you have had other videos rejected in the past, we are unable to
>> reinstate your account. Users with suspended or terminated accounts are
>> prohibited from creating new accounts or accessing YouTube?s community. In
>> order for your account to be reinstated, you will need to resolve at least
>> one of the following video removals.
>>
>> The following videos have been removed from your account:
>>
>> Penalty 1: "evasion of being sutra" formerly at
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gP0Np_s3Bj4 Removed due to a copyright
>> claim by Viacom International Inc. on 02/03/2007
>>
>> Penalty 2:
>> "avatar sex hex dance for Anita Berber" formerly at
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1e-HxYJm8A8
>> Removed for violating our Terms of Use on 02/14/2011.
>> Please see http://www.youtube.com/t/terms and
>> http://www.youtube.com/t/community_guidelines
>>
>> IMPORTANT: If you feel a content owner has misidentified your content as
>> infringing, you may be able to resolve one or more of these penalties by
>> filing a counter-notification. For more information, please visit our Help
>> Center article about counter-notifications at
>> http://help.youtube.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?answer=59826.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> The YouTube Team
>>
>>
>> Original Message Follows:
>> ------------------------
>> From: [email protected]
>> Subject: Account Inquiry
>>
>> no idea why my account was terminated. I haven't added to it for a couple
>> of years. there was no nudity on it. i never received notice. most of the
>> work was dancework. please inform.
>>
>> AutoDetectedBrowser: Google Chrome 10
>> AutoDetectedOS: Linux
>> IssueType: accountdisabled
>> Language: en
>> username: asondheim
>>
>> MY REPLIES (There are four of them):
>>
>> no idea why my account was terminated. I haven't added to it for a couple
>> of years. there was no nudity on it. i never received notice. most of the
>> work was dancework. please inform.
>>
>> I've never had videos rejected in the past as far as I know - never. This
>> isn't making sense to me.
>> - Alan
>>
>> In terms of the Anita Berber piece, as far as I can tell, that was put up
>> 2007; you changed terms of Use in 2011, but I haven't put up anything in a
>> couple of years (check the account) - and as a result, I never saw these
>> terms. I'm an artist; I've been extremely careful about what I've put up;
>> I think I had something like 70+ videos on YouTube. For you to take them
>> all out, because of new regulations (why wasn't I told earlier about
>> something that happened four years ago)? seems inherently wrong. As far as
>> the Viacom ruling, I have no idea what that's about and am trying to track
>> that down.
>>
>> Please reconsider this; it's not making sense to me.
>>
>> This is making less and less sense. What on earth is wrong with Evasion of
>> Being? Viacom had nothing to do with this; it's a figure from Poser,
>> that's all. It came out of my modifications of motion capture equipment at
>> the virtual environments lab at West Virginia University. This is
>> senseless to me; please explain. What did Viacom say to you? - Thanks,
>> Alan (still trying to locate the other video)
>>
>> Finally, on the Anita Berber video - you say "against spam, spams, and
>> commercially deceptive content" - Where on earth is there any of this in
>> an artwork? I can't find the original video, but the piece isn't spam, nor
>> do I imitate commercial works.
>>
>> Again, please explain.
>>
>> =========================================================================
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>
>
>
> Simon Biggs
> [email protected]
> http://www.littlepig.org.uk/
>
> [email protected]
> http://www.elmcip.net/
> http://www.eca.ac.uk/circle/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
>


==
email archive: http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
webpage http://www.alansondheim.org
music archive: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
current text http://www.alansondheim.org/qy.txt
==
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to