can any non-renewable energy source really be "clean"?
(even renewable ones aren't totally clean ... unless perhaps we all had 
a bicycle-powered generator in our house & had to pedal while we worked ...)

On 29/03/11 3:10 PM, dave miller wrote:
> Hi james
>
> I've heard this as well and maybe it's all true. Definitely Thorium
> sounds a lot safer. But I think it's a case of "we've spent so much on
> this damned thing that we have to use it" rather than "lets stop
> repeating all our mistakes and look for safe alternatives".
>
> I used to work in a patents office in Holborn, many years ago. It was
> probably the worst job I ever had, but at least I got the chance to
> read all the patent applications. There were lots for alternative
> energy inventions, but they used to get bought up quickly - by - guess
> who? - the oil companies, who then probably got Anderson Consulting to
> shred them. Actually I've no idea where they ended up, but my point
> is, to limit ourselves to nuclear as the only viable "clean" energy is
> a fake choice.
>
> Thanks for the info on the article though, will try to get a copy of
> the current news scientist
>
> cheers, dave
>
____________________________________________________________

helen varley jamieson: creative catalyst
[email protected]
http://www.creative-catalyst.com
http://www.avatarbodycollision.org
http://www.upstage.org.nz
____________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to