presume to be april fool type joke.... m.
On 1 Apr 2011, at 23:27, Rob Myers wrote: > On 01/04/11 21:51, bob catchpole wrote: >> >> Are you sure you know what you're talking about? > > Yes. > > "[...]early in the history of photography, there was a series of > judicial decisions that could well have changed the course of > photography substantially. Courts were asked whether the photographer, > amateur or professional, required permission before he could capture and > print whatever image he wanted. Their answer was no.[^31] > > The arguments in favor of requiring permission will sound surprisingly > familiar. The photographer was "taking" something from the person or > building whose photograph he shot - pirating something of value.[...]" > > http://www.jus.uio.no/sisu/free_culture.lawrence_lessig/plain.txt > > - Rob. > > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
