Hi all,

I have copied onto here an email originally posted by Roberta Buiani on 
the NETTIME list, regarding the trials & tribulations of an artist 
called Luca Lo Coco, sued for parodying FlashArt Italia, which describes 
some disturbing implications for those who wish to continue or in the 
future critique 'big' mainstream art institutions etc...

It would be interesting to know what others think. I am thinking of 
either asking Roberta to write about it for furtherfield or write about 
it myself. If anyone else is interested in writing on this specific 
subject or has any related information, please let me know.

Wishing all well.

marc

---------->snip

Italian artist gets punished for parodying FlashArt Italia.

Cloning or parodying websites of big institutions or corporations might 
make people smile, but doesn't usually get much more attention beyond 
that. very seldom are these efforts considered "dangerous" and even if 
they are, the common and best strategy by those parodied is ignoring 
them. this is the best way to make these works virtually invisible.

this is why it is very surprising and troubling to see what just 
happened to young net artist Luca Lo Coco.

about 5 years ago, outraged by the hypocrisy of the mainstream art 
system and by the commodification that transpired from well known arts 
magazines, he decided to build his own version of Flash Art Italia.

This would be interpreted by a number of people as another work of 
netart (especially by the FlashArt folks, who, one would imagine, should 
know that these works are not a novelty in this field) . therefore, it 
would be ...well..ignored.

Not a chance.

the director of Flash Art, Giancarlo Politi, took it personally. Luca 
was sued, his website closed and later condemned to pay 7000 euros for 
the legal costs (originally mr. politi had asked for 200,000Euro). not 
being able to produce that amount, he had all his furniture confiscated.

really?

is this some kind of demonstration that the powerful and strong always 
prevails over the young and unequipped?
a personal revenge?
obtusity (and ignorance)?

while we are mobilizing to help Luca and to make this thing very public, 
I thought I would disseminate this episode beyond the italian context.

rb


ps. here is a short account of what happened to Luca. it is worth a 
read. I loved his story telling

It was around 2005, when I found myself in one of those not-too-pleasant 
situations—whose outcome, as soon as they are over, often produces 
strong creative drives. I decided to buy a couple of contemporary arts 
magazines to find out who would be today’s Picassos. I was approaching 
the world of art with the same naïve spirit of a kid entering a park to 
play with his ball….

As soon as I opened what I thought was the most striking magazine, I was 
left semi-horrified by the huge amount of pages dedicated to the ads 
before I was even able to reach the first page really dedicated to the 
arts. This so-longed page appeared with a title –in capital 
letters—“Letters to the director.”Next to the title, a bold guy, 
portrayed in a photo that appeared to mimic one of those commemorative 
pictures of saints. A delicate purple line framed the picture, reminding 
me of the vestments of a saddened priest during lent. After reading the 
first few letters, I realized that I hadn’t found in them anything but 
the lessons of a bitter teacher who was mercilessly chastising his students.

I decided to keep browsing the magazine. I closed it half an hour later. 
I had opened it to look for art but I had only found the art market
At that point, I felt the urge to express my surprise. As a very natural 
reaction, I decided to project my frustration using the Net. I had no 
knowledge whatsoever of the medium, so I turned to my friend –a 
webmaster—for advice. My friend Giulio gave me www.ashartonline.comas a 
birthday present. I remember that I was so ignorant about HTML 
programming that in order to help him reproduce the site of the 
magazine, I handed him a sheet with some measurements in cm (taken form 
my computer screen):]

Even right now, I don’t know exactly why I decided to create a website 
to vent my frustrations. My approach was absolutely instinctive: I 
hadn’t heard of NetArt yet, nor had I heard of any other form of art 
online. However, I came out with this site, www.ashartonline.com, which 
was active between January and June. The site had a graphic design that 
resembled the platform it was imitating. “Ash” was missing two letters 
only “fl” to become “Flashart.” This was enough though to convey a 
different meaning brought up by the word “ash” in the 
domain.www.ashartonline.com was similar to www.flashartonline.com, not 
the same. A few little differences in the news, some corrections in some 
articles enacted the criticism. Furermore, there was a forum open to 
everybody. The project was doing rather well. People subscribing to it 
were increasing. Among the sections in the forum there was a part 
dedicated to “Letters to the director part two", a section dedicated to 
those who had received unpolite replies from the director (in the paper 
magazine). The replies in this section kept multiplying, until, I think, 
they really bothered the subject to whom they were addressed. However, 
what really triggered his reaction was the publication in three weeks of 
the “ash art diary”, a collection of email addresses of Italian artists, 
ctitics curators. It was possible to download the list for free. The 
website received hundreds of downloads in a few minutes.

On 31 July 2007, a bailiff, soaked with 40 C worth of sirocco from 
Palermo, knocked at my door and handed me a cute pile consisting of 
dozens of pages sent to me by the lawyers of the “super-director.” The 
judicial cause was starting. The obfuscation of the site and four-five 
years of hearings and documents followed. At the end, the final sentence 
condemned me to pay the legal expenses (The fee requested to make up for 
the damage was over 200,000 euros!) Since I am not able to satisfy this 
fee, the “Director” insists that my belongings be confiscated. 18 May 
2011 everything I own at my current residence were confiscated. My mom 
and brother want to kick me out.

If I was asked the question: “would you do it again?” I would reply 
without hesitation “absolutely.” at the end of the day I still believe 
in the “unadulterated” arts.

Luca Lo Coco

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to