From: Edward Picot <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Iteracy and the Digital Humanites/7 year old does
what CNN can't
Thank you Edward for your thoughts. What's particularly sad to me is the amount
of times I've have had incredibly talented students at the university who have
developed their abilities in almost complete isolation from their teachers and
more often than not in spite of their schooling. In my own schooling, I
remember many individuals who exhibited the most intense interest in a subject
only to find out from the teachers that they were "wasting their time." There
was this kid I went through school with that by the time he reached 7th grade
had assembled a stack of comics at least a foot high. Unbelievable stuff!
Sadly, he was known as a "daydreamer" - obviously in the negative sense - from
the teachers and was pretty much an outcast to students. One of the last
memories I have of him before we went to different classes in the 7th or 8th
grade was the teacher confiscating his newest comic book - a rendition of the
band Kiss as superheroes - the teacher
saying that it was the devil at work and that he was going to go to hell if he
wasn't careful - yes, this was in a public school.
Anyway, as a university professor, I'm constantly on the look out for the
hidden talents of students, but I find that either they are very guarded about
things that they're very good at, or they are incredible fans of something that
they are terrible at because they've never had any teachers interested or
knowledgeable enough to help them develop their techniques.
We took our daughter out of school after two years of hearing her teachers talk
about her "daydreaming" being a problem. We joined a school co-op and do a lot
of "field work." She's ahead of all the public school texts for her "grade" and
we generally devote about 2 - 3 hours a day to bookwork. The rest is free time
to play, create, field trips, etc. It's hard to imagine that kids are kept from
7:30 AM to 3:30 PM in the schools and they're still behind us. Maybe they're
not doing enough daydreaming!
Best,
Mark
Dear all -
Apologies for coming so late to this. I was reading through the thread
yesterday at work, instead of getting on with what I was meant to be doing. A
big "right on" to James for his remarks about gardening. And a big thanks to
Mark Cooley for that lovely video.
If everybody needs to understand code because our society is to a large extent
controlled and regulated by code, then everybody should also take a course in
economics... and of course politics... and social sciences, and environmental
science, and God knows what else.
There's too much stuff out there that we really "ought" to know - too much
stuff for any one person to understand. If we try to force feed it to our kids,
they'll just get bored and pissed off. If we try to learn it all ourselves,
we'll just end up in a state of despair. The real thing is, people ought to be
able to involve themselves, get their hands dirty, and get rewards - both real
and spiritual rewards - for their efforts. The gardening model is the correct
one. It's not necessarily the difference between being a consumer and being a
producer, although that comes into it. It's the difference between being a
consumer and being an active participant, a creative invidual.
I completely agree that schools shouldn't be teaching their pupils simply how
to align text and change font in Microsoft Word. They should be teaching them
OpenOffice for a start, and they should not only be encouraging them to explore
how to do some of the more interesting things with it (sticking a video in a
document, running a macro, setting up a relational database etc.) but also
explaining to them how OpenOffice is run and maintained, and how they could
make their own improvements to it if they wanted to. How, in other words, they
could become participants instead of just being consumers. How that model of
participation works.
Here in the Uk lots of us have been watching a documentary series on Channel 4
called "Educating Essex". I bet Michael's been glued to it, for a start, as
it's set in Harlow where he lives. It's a great documentary series, but the
trouble with it is that it seems to focus on kids with problems, and it gives
the impression that all the teachers are involved in a desperate struggle to
get these problem kids a decent education, because if they don't get a decent
education then they'll never get decent jobs, and they'll be on the social
scrapheap as a result, running the risk of poverty, ill health, drug abuse and
crime. What it doesn't show is that as well as being difficult, emotionally
unstable, sexually volatile, hilarious and sometimes nasty, adolescent kids are
very often incredibly creative, and schools these days are hardly giving that
creativity anywhere to go, because they're so busy focussing on this priority
of getting the kids good
qualifications so they can get good jobs.
My daughter's at secondary school at the moment, and needless to say she's got
creativity coming out of her ears. She's doing drawings, making videos, writing
stories, you name it. She's really chuffed if they get pinned up on the wall,
but they never go anywhere further than that. There's no school magazine.
There's a big posh school website, but they never show any examples of pupils'
work on it. It seems to me that every school should have a participatory
website, and they should be publishing drawings, stories, poems, videos, music
by kids who are in bands, animations if the kids are doing animations,
interactive art if the kids are doing that. If someone has designed a
space-rocket or a robot, put it on the website. If someone's come up with a
good dance routine, take a video of it and put that on too. A good rap; a good
joke; a good impersonation of a teacher; a really funny face, etc. etc.
Probably the kids should be designing the website itself.
But the schools are so busy focussing on exam results and league-tables that
anything which doesn't contribute towards their targets tends to get
overlooked, and their websites are basically online brochures designed to sell
the school to outsiders, instead of ways of promoting creativity within the
school and a sense of community and identity. Anything which doesn't fit into
the curriculum is getting shoved to one side, and the schools are basically
starting the process of alienation which for most people will dominate their
adult lives - the separation between what you really are and really want to do
one the one hand, and what you are obliged to do in order to fit into society
on the other - the dividing up of existence into a working life which is
unfulfilling but earns you the money you need to survive, and a private life or
"leisure time" where you spend your earnings as a consumer trying to buy back
some of the personal fulfillment of which you
have been deprived during your working hours.
Our idea of creativity and people getting a chance to show their talents is
something like "The X Factor" or " Britain 's Got Talent" - programmes which
are basically all about trying to find inviduals who fit into pre-existent
entertainment industry moulds, rather than people who can really do something
new and original. A top-down view of talent, instead of a bottom-up one. It's
like teaching people how to use Microsoft Word instead of teaching them the
principles of word processing and how they could create their own software if
they wanted to. It's a whole vision of society where you have to fit into a
mould in order to get anywhere, rather than being able to create your own
alternative way of doing things.
This is exactly where the big corporations want us to be, of course - they want
us to be passive consumers gobbling up their products, not creative
self-empowered individuals or collectives, coming up with our own alternatives.
We tend to demonise the big corporations and assume that they're deliberately
conspiring to crush the little people, whereas in fact if you talked to the
people who work in those corporations they're probably not really monsters at
all, and they'd probably protest that all they're trying to do is the best job
they can for the businesses they work in. I daresay Steve Jobs and Bill Gates
saw themselves as good guys, not bad guys. But modern capitalism tends towards
big corporations and mass-marketing techniques - a process which has only been
enhanced by the power of the internet and the web - and the end result is that
ordinary people have to live their lives amongst the consequences of global
marketing events with which they have
no engagement and over which they have no control. It seems to me that there's
a direct relationship between the process of alienation which begins in our
schools and the situation portrayed in the "7 year old does what CNN can't"
video - a situation in which the "little people" are driven to protesting on
street corners while the banks, the corporations and the governments dismantle
parts of the social fabric in an attempt to repair the financial disasters
they've created themselves.
So yes, teach people code: but what you really need to teach them is what code
symbolises: how to get under the skin of a system, be it a piece of software or
a social organisation - how to pull up the hood and fiddle about with the
engine, how to get your hands dirty, get involved, participate, don't accept
things as you find them, try to build your own alternative.
- Edward
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
